To immerse yourself in Frontier Partisans history is to walk a path into darkness. From a very young age I was drawn as though magnetized to the heroic myth of the frontier hunter exploring and settling wild lands. By the time I was in my teens, I was steeped deeply enough in the history to recognize that my Frontier Partisan heroes were harbingers — and often perpetrators — of ecological destruction and ethnic cleansing.
I suppose I might have recoiled, but I didn’t. I went deeper.
At some point, there was a conscious decision that I would embrace the history in all of its genuine heroism and its inglorious brutality. There is plenty of both, and it’s not just an American phenomenon. Frontier societies from Siberia to South Africa, from Canada to New Zealand and Australia, manifested strikingly similar stories. Hell, go back further into the mists of time, to the frontiers of Rome, or to the Danes’ invasions of Saxon England, and you will find patterns of colonization and resistance, heroism and skullduggery, prodigious exploitation of the natural world… Continuity & Persistence.
FP reader Monk just scouted up a new book that maps an intimate and personal course through Australia’s Frontier Wars — a history that the Land Down Under is still reckoning with.
David Marr was shocked to discover forebears who served with the brutal Native Police in the bloodiest years on the frontier. Killing for Country is the result – a soul-searching Australian history.
This is a richly detailed saga of politics and power in the colonial world – of land seized, fortunes made and lost, and the violence let loose as squatters and their allies fought for possession of the country – a war still unresolved in today’s Australia.
I’m not deeply versed in Australia’s Frontier Wars, but what I know reminds me of the mid-19th Century Indian hunting endemic to California and southern Oregon. Settlers responded to killings or livestock thefts by aboriginal people with punitive expeditions that resulted in disproportionate and often indiscriminate killings that in many cases amounted to massacres. Ben Wright would have been right at home in the Australian bush.
It bears keeping in mind that the native peoples, too, were indiscriminate in seeking payback. Logan’s revenge for the egregious and gruesome slaughter of his family on Yellow Creek near the Ohio River in 1774 was to fall on settlers in the Pennsylvania and Virginia backcountry that had no hand in the crime. They were there, and they represented the tribe of Logan’s enemies, so he glutted his vengeance on them — innocents though they were — in a welter of blood.
This kind of history is fraught, and it really becomes a minefield when it is tied to modern political ideologies. Those who insist on a triumphalist view of Western history can be provoked to rage by any evocation of the darker aspects of our story. I suspect that it threatens some people’s sense of identity, and their belief in the fundamental “goodness” of our civilization. Some take the darkness as evidence that our whole civilization is, in fact, rotten at the core, and was from its inception. Thus, of course, it needs to be overturned and replaced.
I saw a lot of the latter as an undergraduate at UC Santa Cruz, which was an early adopter of many of the “progressive” shibboleths that pervade higher education today. My Native American History classes constantly threatened to dissolve into therapeutic rant sessions where fundamentally angry personalities riddled with ressentiment could ascribe their multitude of dissatisfactions to white supremacy and the patriarchy. Since I represented both to some of those folks — due to being large, white, male and adorned in a hat and boots — I was privileged to act as a lightning rod. It was more fun than it might sound.
I don’t trust those people. They are ideological kin of the people who promulgated Year Zero concepts of social revolution that were responsible for atrocities on a scale that even the most hardened Indian killer might blanch at.
I’ve also raised the ire of some folks who think history should be “patriotic.” One reader was enraged that I ran a column on the 125th anniversary of the Wounded Knee massacre — in the “Christmas edition” of The Nugget, no less. He slagged me off with great heat and vitriol all over Facebook, but we ended up having a decent conversation when I invited him over for coffee. Make of that what you will.
The Darkness demands something more of us than history as propaganda. Mostly it demands that we grow comfortable with discomfort, because there are no uncomplicated black-hat/white-hat scenarios in real life. Good people sometimes do horrible things out of fear and rage, and through justifying ideologies that cloak self-interest. Bad people take advantage of unsettled conditions to give rein to sadistic impulses. People get caught up in moments of intense emotion. And people of all stripes sometimes do unfathomably brave and noble things, at profound cost.
The Frontier Partisans project is about seeking to understand what happened and why across the wide geography and timeline of frontier history, right up to today. It requires empathy and a certain degree of humility. It’s not free of judgment — but all judgment has to be nuanced and contingent. It’s always going to be an imperfect work in progress.
And the trail is always going to lie, at least in part, in the shadow of The Darkness.




Matthew says
The more I study history the more I believe the Christian doctrine that we are all sinners.
No group really comes across innocent. Genocide and slavery were frighteningly common in history. I think we need to figure out how to live with that.
Quixotic Mainer says
I can’t hear the Aussie wars mentioned without my mind calling up the cliff massacre scene from Quigley…
You’re right though, history is nothing if not replete with courage and altruism, offset by barbarity and covetousness. The cognitive dissonance it takes for either side to ignore the yin yang of humanity is pretty staggering.
I’m not sure how your erstwhile critic could defend Wounded Knee from any perspective. Even if the shooting was started by the tribe, it was at worst vengeful ethnic cleansing, and at best spastic panic fire amongst noncombatants.
JimC says
He wasn’t defending Wounded Knee. He just didn’t think I should be writing about it. Didn’t want to hear about it, especially in the holiday season. His position was, yeah, bad things happened, but we’re good, so…
That is the tendency with the “patriotic history” crowd — it’s not so much about defending the bad stuff (although “Look! The slaves learned trades!” comes close). It’s more about memory-holing anything unpleasant or uncomfortable.
Matthew says
People don’t like confronting things that make them uncomfortable; even though the only thing you can do with the uncomfortable is confront it.
I’ve seen this in literature and art and music where people only want heartwarming fun art. Now, art can be those things and be good, but there is a place for dark and tragic art. However, people who only want positive art will actually say it is immoral and that its creators and fans are so too. Thing is dark and tragic works can have a moral message and happy ones can not. Alice Cooper, the king of shock rock who fakes his own decapitation, whose work is dark is more moralistic than the rather jaunty music of Cole Porter. The later seemed to believe “Anything Goes.” Yet, who is more often played in “polite” company.
JimC says
We only grow through discomfort. Physical training literally breaks down the muscles and creates growth. This is not to argue that only the “dark stuff” has value — I value the heart-warming, too. In fact, the heart-warming becomes all the more valuable because it is fragile, yet a light against the dark. Tolkien understood this well.
John says
You used the term “shibboleths” about your times at S.C.
In the Book of Judges – Old Testament – they used the term to ferret out their enemies.
The Gileadites captured the fords of the Jordan leading to Ephraim, and whenever a survivor of Ephraim said, “Let me cross over,” the men of Gilead asked him, “Are you an Ephraimite?” If he replied, “No,” they said, “All right, say `Shibboleth.'” If he said, “Sibboleth,” because he could not pronounce the word correctly, they seized him and killed him at the fords of the Jordan. Forty-two thousand Ephraimites were killed at that time.
42,000 killed. The Darkness, indeed.
JimC says
Well that’s fun stuff.
Clint says
you jinxed us with this article! 😉
JimC says
Synchronicity strikes a lot around here, and usually it’s cool. This is… weird and unsettling.